( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 97    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

DEVELOPMENT OF NOMINAL PLURAL FORMS IN EARLY MIDDLE ENGLISH

    2 Author(s):  PRASHANTH. N, DR. P.C. AGARWAL

Vol -  1, Issue- 2 ,         Page(s) : 150 - 156  (2010 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

This significant examination is a published rendition of Ryuichi Hotta's doctoral thesis (Glasgow, 2005). It speaks to a meticulously close analysis of ostensible plural structures in 247 scribal writings, primarily replicated between the second 50% of the twelfth and the main portion of the fourteenth hundreds of years; 134 of these were looked electronically obligingness of pre-distribution access to the labeled writings arranged by the Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English task, and the book in this way remains as one of the principal published examinations to draw widely on LAEME information. Following introductory areas reviewing past grant and investigating the Germanic foundation, the centerpiece of the book is its introduction of its broad informational collection. For each of his writings, Hotta has gathered the 'regular case plural types of prototypical things that happen outside rhyming positions' (p. 40), and orders each one of these structures as indicated by the sexual orientation and plural sort of its Old English predecessor and subsequently the progressions it has experienced by early Middle English.

1. "Making Early Middle English: About the Conference".hcmc.uvic.ca.
2. Burchfield, Robert W. (1987). "Ormulum". In Strayer, Joseph R. Dictionary of the Middle Ages. 9. New York: Charles cribner's Sons. p. 280. ISBN 0-684-18275-0., p. 280
3. Crystal, David (1995). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 32.
4. Jespersen, Otto (1919). Growth and Structure of the English Language. Leipzig, Germany: B. G. Teubner. pp. 58–82.
5. Lohmeier, Charlene (28 October 2012). "121028 Charlene Lohmeier "Evolution of the English Language" - 23:40 - 25:00; 30:20 - 30:45; 45:00 - 46:00". 121028 Charlene Lohmeier "Evolution of the English Language". Dutch Lichliter. Retrieved 12 January 2010.
6. Maidstone Museum A. 13: Death's Wither-Clench (or Long Life), main hand of English. SE (549,136) C13a. cf. Brown (13th, Verse 10A). maidstdwct.
7. McCrum, Robert (1987). The Story of English. London: Faber and Faber. pp. 70–71.
8. McWhorter, Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue, 2008, pp. 89–136.
9. Potter, Simeon (1950). Our Language. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin. p. 33.
10. Sawyer 1045. SEM (560,308) C13b2. Conflated as ##1400. LAEME Corpus. 3SIO45Fft.
11. Sawyer 1069. SEM (560,308) C13b2. Conflated as ##1400. LAEME Corpus. 4SIO69Fft Cambridge University Library . 
12. Stowe 34: Vices and Virtues, hand A. SEM (547,207) C13a1. cf. Holthausen (Part 2). vvat.
13. Trinity Homilies XXXII, hand B. SEM (571,267) C12b2. Conflated as ##1300. LAEME Corpus; cf. Morris (OEH, vol. 53: Text XXXII).
14. Wright, L. (2012). "About the evolution of Standard English". Studies in English Language and Literature.Routledge. p. 99ff. ISBN 978-1138006935.
15. Mulimani B.N {2009) “Teaching of English language: Basaveshwar Research Information Centre, jayanagar, Dharwad

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details