( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 137    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

THE THIRD WORLD CHALLENGES TO DIPLOMACY IN AN UNEQUAL INTERNATIONAL ORDER

    1 Author(s):  KAVERI BEDI

Vol -  8, Issue- 7 ,         Page(s) : 46 - 55  (2017 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

“Man’s ability to participate intelligently in the evolution of his own system is dependent on his ability to perceive the whole”: Immanuel Wallerstein (2004: 34). Introduction: The Argument Immanuel Wallerstein makes this statement in his seminal work on the Modern World System wherein he analyzes the social and economic forces of dominance present in the international structure and explains how knowledge of the same is essential for an actor/state to transcend the built-in hegemony. Wallerstein’s World System Theory draws heavily from the Dependency Theory which discusses the division of labor in the state system wherein the periphery states participate in producing raw materials for the world economy and the core states produce manufactured goods. This in turn creates an unequal exploitative relationship with the advanced capitalist countries economically dominating over the weaker subaltern states and thereby creating a structure of hegemony.

  1. Allan, Jen Iris and Dauvergne Peter (2013), “The Global South in Environmental Negotiations: the politics of coalitions in REDD+”, Third World Quaterly, 34(8): 1307-1322.
  2.  Albin, Cecilia (2008), “Using Negotiation to Promote Legitimacy: An Assessment of Proposals for Reforming the WTO”, International Affairs, 84(4): 757-775. 
  3. Ayoob, Mohammed (2003), “Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism”, International Studies Review, 4(3): 27-48. 
  4. Beyerlin, Ulrich (2006), “Bridging the North-South Divide in International Environmental Law”, ZaoRV , 66(1): 259-296.
  5.  Chimni, B.S. (2004), “International Institutions Today: An Imperial Global State in the Making”, EJIL, 15(1): 1-37. 
  6. Chimni, B.S. (2006), “Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto”, International Community Law Review, 8(1): 3-27.
  7.  Chowdhry, Geeta and Nair, Sheila (2002), Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations, London: Routledge. 
  8. Hurrell, Andrew and Sengupta, Sandeep (2012), “Emerging Powers, North-South Relations and Global Climate Politics”, International Affairs, 88(3): 463-484. 
  9. Hochstetler, Kathryn (2012), “The G-77, BASIC, and Global Climate Governance: a New Era in Multilateral Environmental Negotiations”, Rev. Bras. Polit, 55(1): 53-69.
  10.  Kasa, Sjur; Gullberg, Anne; Heggelund, Gorild (2008), “The Group of 77 in the International Climate Negotiations: Recent Developments and Future Directions”, International Environment Agreements, 8(1): 113-127. 
  11. Linner, Bjorn- Ola and Jacob, Merle (2005), “From Stockholm to Kyoto and Beyond: A Review of the Globalization of Global Warming Policy and North-South Relations”, Globalizations, 2(3): 403-415. 
  12. Levy, Marc A. et al. (1995), “ Improving the Effectiveness of International Environmental Institutions”, in Hass, Peter M. and Keohane, Robert O. and Levy, Marc A. (eds.) Institutions for the Earth, London: MIT Press. 
  13. Litonjua, M.D. (2010), “International Free Trade, the WTO, and the Third World/Global South”, Journal of Third World Studies, 27(2): 45-65.
  14.  Miller, Marian A.L. (1995), The Third World in Global Environmental Politics, New York: Lynne Rienner Pub. 
  15. Najam, Adil (2005), “Developing Countries and Global Environmental Governance: From Contestation to Participation to Engagement”, International Environmental Agreements, 5(1): 303-321. 

  16. O’Hagan, Jacinta (2002), “Conflict, Convergence or Co-existance? The Relevance of Culture in Reframing World Order”, in Richard Falk et. al. (eds.) Reframing the International: Law, Culture and Politics, New York: Routledge. 
  17. Paterson, Matthew (2000), Understanding Global Environmental Politics: Domination, Accumulation, Resistance, New York: Palgrave. Roberts, Timmons and Parks, Bradley (2008), “A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics and Climate Policy”, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4): 409-412. 
  18. Said, Edward (2001), Power, Politics and Culture, New York: Pantheon Books. 
  19. Sen, Amartya (1999), Development as Freedom, New York: Alfred A. Knopf 
  20. Wade, Robert (2010), “What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of ‘development space’”, Review of International Political Economy, 10(4): 621-644. 
  21. Wallerstein, Immanuel (2004), World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, New York: Duke University Press.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details