( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 91    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CREATIVITY OF ELEMENTARY TEACHERS TEACHING SENIOR SECONDARY STUDENTS OF PUNJAB RELATING TO THEIR SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

    1 Author(s):  SWATI

Vol -  8, Issue- 4 ,         Page(s) : 15 - 28  (2017 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

Creativity is a universal ability. In is present in some manner is everyone. When it is available in moderate degree, it is not conspicuously perceptible. In the case of excellence it becomes perceptible. To find out the socio-economic status of the students in the present study the SESS that could be easily and objectively measure the socio-economic status of the students in different situations of the society and group life was required in this research study. For this research study sample was taken for Schools who’s ETT and +2 students take education. It is found that there will be no significant difference in academic achievements of students studying in Govt. or Private Schools.

  1. Asthana, M. (1992). Reaction to Frustration Among High Creative and Low Creative Girls in Relation to Socio-Economic Status. Journal of Education and Psychology, 49 (1-2, April-July 1992.
  2. Awasthi. V (1989). Developing Training Strategy for Science Teaching by using Concept Attainment Model, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis (Edu.), DAW, Indore Badrinath, S., 
  3. Barron. F. (1952). Creativity and Psychological Health. D. Van Nostrand Company Inc, Princiton, New Jersey.
  4. Bartlet. F (1969). Assessing Creative Thinking Abilities. In Torranto Paul (1969), Experiments in Classroom Creativity, Bureau of Educational Research, Minnetota.
  5. Best, J.W & Kahn, J.V (2005). Research in Education. Pearson Publication, New Delhi
  6. Boehm, Patricia (2009). Fostering Creativity While Nurturing Learners. Knowledge Quest, 37 (5) p38-41 May-Jun.
  7. Bolden, David S.; Harries, Tony V.; Newton, Douglas P. (2010). Pre-Service Primary Teachers' Conceptions of Creativity in Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73 (2) pi43-157.
  8. Traditional Method towards Achievement and their Interaction with the Learners. Bharateeya Shikshan, 9, No. 1
  9. Cheek, J.F. (1970). An Analysis of Differences In Creative Ability Between White And Negro Students, Public and Parochial, Three different Grades Levels Male and Females. APA Experimental Publication System. 9.
  10. Chitkara, M (1985). To Study the Effectiveness of Different Strategies of Teaching on Achievement in Mathematics in Relation to Intelligence, Sex and Personality. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis (Edu.), Pan. Univ., Panjee 
  11. Cicirelli, V.G. (1967). Sibling Conatilation, Creativity, IQ and Academic Achievement. Chllfl Development. 38, 481-490.
  12. Cramond. M. and Bonnie, T (1994). The Torrance tests of creative Thinking from design through establishment of predictive validity. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 81(17), 81-88.
  13. Cropley. David; Cropley, Arthur (2010). Recognizing and Fostering Creativity in Technological Design Education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20 (3) p345-358.
  14. Deshmukh, M.N (1980). Analytical Study of Some Scholastic Conditions and Practices as Contributory Factors to Creative Ability. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, D.U. Delhi.
  15. Dussart. G. B. J. (1990). Creativity in the Language of Biology. Journal of Biological Education, 24 (4) p277-82.
  16. Edward. M.P., and Tryler, L.E. (1965). Intelligence, Creativity and Achievement in a Non-Selected Public Junior High School. Journal q! Educational Psychology, 56, 2, 96-99.
  17. Freud. S. (1947). Accentuate the positive and the (egative : Re-thinking the use of self esteem. self deprecation and self-confidence social psychology, Quarterly, 56(4) 288-299.
  18. Gangoli. S.G. and Gurumurthy, C (1985). A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Open Ended Approach at Higher Secondary Stage. R.C.E., Mysore 
  19. Gerett, H.E (2005). Statistics in Psychology and Education. Paragon International Publishers. New Delhi.
  20. Giauque. Gerald S. (1985). Creativity and Foreign Language Learning. Hispania, 68 (2) p 425-27.
  21. Gingerich. Owen (1978). Circumventing Newton: A Study in Scientific Creativity. American Journal of Physics, 46, 3, 202-6.
  22. Guilford. J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist. Xv. 5.
  23. Hong, Miyoung; Kang, Nam-Hwa (2010). South Korean and the US Secondary School Science Teachers' Conceptions of Creativity and Teaching for Creativity.  International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8 (5) p821-843 Oct. 
  24. Khan. A.A. (1994). Sex and Educational Stream Differences on Verbal Creative Thinking, Journal fif Personality and Clinical Studies. 10(1-2).
  25. Koul, L (2006). Methodology of Educational Research. Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., Delhi
  26. Lin, Chongde; Hu, Weiping; Adey, Philip; Shen, Jiliang (2003). The Influence of CASE on Scientific Creativity. Research in Science Education, 33 (2) pi43-62. Livingston. Larry (2010). Teaching Creativity in Higher Education. Arts Education Policy Review, 111 (2) p59-62.
  27. Marron et al. (1966). Synectics : An Explanation of the Process and Some Comment: its Application in the Secondary School.
  28. Martis, Anadi (1989). Developing Making the Strange Familiar (MSF) Competent through Synectics Model of Teaching in Graduate Student Teachers and Study of their Reactions and the Reactions of Pupils. Unpublished Doct Thesis, DAW. Indore, M.P.
  29. Miller. James E., Jr. (1974). Everyman with a Blue Guitar: Imagination, Creativity, Language. ADE Bulletin, 43, 38-43.
  30. Mirra, B.C. (1987). Creativity in Students of Two Types of24 (1).
  31. Mishra, B.C. (1986). Relationship Between Creativity And Problem Solving Ability At Different Levels of Intelligence. Indian Education Review., 21 (4).
  32. Passi, B.K., and Lalitha, M.L. (1975). A Factorial Study Creativity, Intelligence and Self- Concept Adolescents. Psychological studies 1975
  33. Patel, R.P (1988). Development of Brainstorming Technique Programme and to study its Effects on Creativity of the Secondary School children. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis (Edu.), S.P.U.
  34. Pepler, D.J., and H.S. Rose (1981). The Effect of Play on Convergent and Divergent Thinking. Development, 52.
  35. Phatak, Premile (1968). Creativity and Education. N. LE. Journal, March.
  36. Raina, M.K (1969). Creativity Research in India: An analysis. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 3
  37. Ribot. W.C. (1900). Birth order and its sequel. Journal of child development, 4(2), 44-49.
  38. Ross. William T. (1978). Language, Metaphor, and Creativity in Discursive Prose. Freshman English News, 7 (2) p21 -24.
  39. Rosseel, Eddy, Ed.: Young Silva, Catherine, Ed. (1982). Creativity and Language Dynamics: I—Creativity and Foreign Language Teaching. Proceedings of an AIMAV Seminar (11th. Brussels, Belgium, May 7-13, 1978). (ED280286)
  40. Saxena, M., and Sharma, V.K- (1986). An Empirical Investigation into Adjustment Patterns of Hign and Low Creative Adolescents, Hanas, 22 .; 1-2., 65-73.
  41. Sharma, A.K. and Jarial. A S. (1980). Factorial Study of the Effect of SES, Grade Levels And Their Interaction upon Creativity and Its Components. Trends in Education., 7(1 & 2, 37-42.
  42. Sood. R. (1985). Personality Correlates of Scientific Creativity and Academic Achievement In Relation To Levels of Aspiration. M. Phil Dissertation, K.U,.
  43. Sushma Gulati (1995). Education for Creativity, A Resource Book for Teacher Educators. New Delhi : NCERT, Publication Division
  44. Thomson. Pat; Sanders, Ethel (2010). Creativity and Whole School Change: An Investigation of English Headteacher Practices. Journal of Educational Change, 11 (1) p63-83.
  45. Thrustone, L.L. (1952). Creative Talent Application Psychology, Harper and Row, Hew York.
  46. Triffinger, D.J. (1986). Research on Creativity. Gifted Child quarterly, 30(1).
  47. Verma, Bipin Chander (1991). Effects of Personalized System of Instruction and Bloom's Mastery Learning Strategy on Achievement and Certain Non-Cognitive Variables of Students. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis (Edu.), H.P.Univ., Himachal Pradesh
  48. Vernon. P.E. (1989). The Nature Nurture Problem Creativity. in Glover J.A., Ronning R.R. Reynolds C.R. (eds). Hand Book of Creativity, Plenum Press, New York.
  49. Ward. W.C. and Cox, P.W. (1974). A Gifted Study of Non-Verbal Creativity. Journal of Personality, 42(2), 1974 .
  50. Yamamoto, K. (). Role of Creative Thinking And Intelligence in High School Achievement. Psychological Reports, 14.283-289.
  51. Yang. Heng-Li; Cheng, Hsiu-Hua (2010). Creativity of Student Information System Projects: From the Perspective of Network Embeddedness. Computers & Education, 54 (1) p209-221 Jan .
  52. Young, T. and Leonard, M. (1994). Relations between creativity and intelligence among Malaysian Pupils Perceptual and Motor Skills 79(2), 739-742.
  53. Yudess, Jo (2010). Colleges and Universities with Degree or Certificate Bearing Programs in Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44 (2) pi39-142 Second Quarter.
  54. Zampetakis, Leonidas A.; Bouranta, Nancy; Moustakis, Vassilis S. (2010). On the Relationship between Individual Creativity and Time Management. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1) p23-32.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details