( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 81    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

EFFECT OF CONCEPT ATTAINMENT MODEL ON VERBAL CREATIVITY OF 11 TO 14 YEAR OLD STUDENTS

    1 Author(s):  J. SHRIVASTAVA . H.UPADHYAY

Vol -  7, Issue- 7 ,         Page(s) : 97 - 106  (2016 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

The main objective of the present study was to see the effect of concept attainment model on verbal creativity of 11 to 14 year old students, as a function of treatment and gender and their interaction. For this purpose the investigator selected 508 11 to 14 year old male and female students randomly .All students of the sample were divided in to experimental group and control group. First the Investigator administrate pre-test on students of both the groups after that applied 30days treatment to both the group i.e. experimental group was taught by Concept Attainment Model and Control group was taught by Traditional Method. After treatment the post-test administered by the Investigator on both the group and gain scores were obtained. Data were analyzed by two way analysis of variance. The result revealed that there was a significant difference found in verbal fluency & verbal originality for groups at 0.05 & 0.01 level of significance, respectively.

  1. Agarwal, Raj Rani. (1997). A study of effect of teaching strategies in relation to creativity on conceptual learning of clas XI students of commerce. Indian Educational Review, 33(1), 141-151.
  2. Agarwal, Sweta and Agarwal, Suman. (1999). Creativity and intelligence: Exploration with sex difference. Psycho-lingua, 2(2), 127-132.
  3. Ahmed, Iftikhar., Gujjar, Aijaz Ahmed., & Ali, Akhtar. (2011). A comparative study of effectiveness of concept attainment model and advance organizer model in teaching of English in teacher education course. Language in India, 11(3). Retrieved from
  4. http://www.languageinindia.com/march2011/gujjarconceptattainmentfinal.pdf
  5. Alder, Harry. (2003). CQ Boost your creative intelligence: Powerful ways to improve your creativity quotient. New Delhi: Kogan Page India Private Ltd.Amin, M. J. (1988). To study the effectiveness of creative thinking programme on the creativity programme correlates. In B. K Passi, Creativity and innovations
  6. (pp. 170-215). Fifth Survey of Educational Research 1988-92 Trend reports Volume 1. New Delhi: NCERT.
  7. Anuradha, Joshi., & Anand, Patra. (1993). Impact of concept attainment model on general mental ability. SCERT. Research Bulletin. March-June. Maharashtra.
  8. Behra, Amarendra Prasad. (1993). Sex differences in creativity: A study in Navodayas. Journal of Indian Education, 19(2), 46-48.
  9. Beiser, Arthur. (1960). The world of physics. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc. Best, John W., & Kahn, James V. (2003). Research in education (9th ed.). New Delhi:
  10. Prentice – Hall of India Private Limited.
  11. Bincy, O. G. (2010). Effectiveness of Synectics model of teaching in comparison with lecture method in fostering creativity in students of standard VII
  12. (Unpublished M.Ed thesis). University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram.
  13. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
  14. Chaudhary, Vineeta. (2003). Creativity in relation to level of aspiration and personality. Psycho-lingua, 33(1), 73-71.
  15. Clement, J. (1982). Student's preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71.
  16. Dahiya, S. S. (1995). Effect of mastery learning strategy on pupils’ achievement in mathematics and their creative abilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). M. D University, Rohtak.
  17. Gordon, W. J. J. (1961). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
  18. Mc Connell, David M., & Le Capitaine. (1988). The effects of group creativity training on teachers’ empathy and interaction with students. Reading Improvement, 2(4), 269-275. (EJ386991). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/
  19. Nanda, Arati., & Pal, Gobinda Chand. (1994). Effect of cognitive style and creativity on academic achievement. Journal of Indian Education. 20(1), 42-49.
  20. Nandan pawar, B. S. (1986). Development of linguistic creativity among the students: An experimental study. In B. K Passi, creativity and innovations (pp. 170 – 215). Fifth Survey of Educational Research 1988-92 Trend Reports Volume
  21. I. New Delhi: NCERT.
  22. O’Neil, Sharon B. (1992). Sensational Thinking: An investigation of a teaching/learning model to increase creativity. Dissertation 
  23. International: Section A. Humanities and Social Science, 53(6), 1782-A.
  24. Sha, Bhupendra B. (1981). Experimental investigation of the effects of selected strategies on the development of creative thinking and achievement in science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). M S University of Baroda,.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details