( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 225    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

EUTHANASIA OR MERCY KILLING: A JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE

    1 Author(s):  DR. DEEPAK KUMAR

Vol -  6, Issue- 5 ,         Page(s) : 156 - 159  (2015 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

Everyone believe in development and innovations.The judiciary is also on the same way has developed and introduced useful concepts. Expansion of the dimensions of Right to Life under Art. 21 is the example and evidence also on this view. But in the last few decades some special crafts have been dedicated to this very end by judiciary. On that a debate has started and different opinions came and remains in highlights in the country. Some argued that it should be the part of Right to life and some are. In consideration the issue it came out that the right to die, together with its subsidiary issues like euthanasia may or may not be used as the exception to general rule. This created the havoc in the society and the responsibility again come on the judiciary. And the judiciary had proved itself again by the visionary views.

1. Bakshi, PM (1994) ‘Suicide and Criminal Law’ 36Journal of the Indian Law Institute.
2. Deshpande, VS (1984) ‘To Be or Not To Be’ (1984) 3Supreme Court Cases (Journal Section)10. 
3. Hohfeld, WN (1919)Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. New Haven: Yale University Press.
4. Hurra, S (1993) Public Interest Litigation. Ahmedabad: Mishra & Co.
5. Sathe, SP (2002) Judicial Activism in India: Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limits.
a. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. 
6. Singh, MP (1995) ‘Can There Be a Fundamental Right to Die?’ 17  Delhi Law Review 134.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details