( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 92    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

MEASURING THE REGIONAL VARIATION IN ODISHA USING GIS: A SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS

    1 Author(s):  SONALEE BISWAL

Vol -  6, Issue- 4 ,         Page(s) : 250 - 264  (2015 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

Development is a process, which improves the quality of life. It means a progression from a simpler or lower to a more advanced, mature, or complex form or stage. It is also defined as the gradual advancement or growth through a series of progressive changes. Development is a process not a level. It is a path to achieve certain goals. Micro-level planning is the most effective process of economic planning in developing countries like India. There has been wider disparity among the poor and rich section of the society because of the uneven distribution of infrastructure. Thus micro-level planning reinforces and reallocates the development process starting from lowest to highest level for wider balanced regional development. In India, decentralize planning process is a striking feature having planning machinery operating at state and district level operating under National level. Under district level, block is the micro-level unit of implementing different kinds of rural-regional development programmes. Decentralize planning is very effective in reducing in economic and social disparity and participation, effective use of available resources, and overall development of local areas and so on.

1. Bhandary, U.K. and J.K. Routray (2002), ‘Rural Poverty Analysis And Mapping In Nepal’, AIT-NTNU Project of Cooperation.
2. Booysen, F (2002), ‘An Overview and Evaluation of Composite Indices of Development’, Social Indicators Research, Springer, Vol. 59, No.2, pp.115-151
3. Das, K (2004), ‘Uneven Development and Regionalism: a Critique of Received Theories ’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.39, No.45, pp.4917-4925.
4. Govinda, R. and K. Biswal (2005), ‘Mapping Literacy in India: Who Are The Illiterates And Where Do We Found Them?’ UNESCO.
5. Hossain, M and C Tisdell (2003), ‘Fertility and female work force participation in Bangladesh: Causality and co integration’, School of Economics, the University of Queensland.
6. John, Marry E, Ravinder Kaur, R. Palriwala, S. Raju (2009), ‘Dispensing With Daughters: Technology, Society, Economy in North India’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.XLIV, No.15.
7. Kar, G.C, M. Behera and R.P. Mohanty (2002), ‘Vocational Education in Orissa.
8. Mahendra Dev, S., M Panda and K Sarap (2004):‘Poverty Reduction Strategiesfor Orissa’, report prepared for Government of Orissa.
9. Mallik, R. M and R. K Meher (1999), ‘Impact of IRDP on KBK Districts of Orissa’, Nabakrushna Choudhury Centre for Development Studies, Bhubaneswar (Mimeo).
10. Meher,  R. K. (2001), ‘Impact of Economic Liberalisation on the Backward State and Weaker Sections of Population in India’, Fourth World, No.14, October, pp.58-86.
11. Mishra, S.K. (2001), ‘Poverty and Economic Change in Kalahandi- Orissa: The Unfinished Agenda and the New Challenges’, Journal of Social and Economic Development.
12. Nair, K.R.G. (1993), ‘New Economic Policy and Development of Backward Regions: A Note on Orissa’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 28, No.19, pp.939-941. 

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details