( ISSN 2277 - 9809 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9359 (Print) ) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMSH

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 608    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

JUDICIAL CORRELATES OF JOB RESERVATION

    1 Author(s):  MANIPAL SANDHU

Vol -  5, Issue- 1 ,         Page(s) : 13 - 19  (2014 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMSH

Abstract

The Supreme Court has interpreted Constitutional provisions relating to job reservation in a series of judicial decisions, starting with Balaji vs. State of Mysore , and in Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India , the Court has upheld the validity of reservation for socially backward classes especially in recruitment and promotion. At the same time, the Supreme Court has imposed safeguards against the violation of the principle of equality and merit and the dilution of administrative efficiency .

order online

  1.   All India Recorder, 1963 Supreme Court 649.
  2.   AIR SC 1993 477.
  3.   See Agarwal 2003 and Maheshwari 2000.
  4.   Some states had extended the reservation quota to 69%, and to castes in religions outside Hinduism. 
  5.   However, the state of Tamil Nadu passed a law in 1993 to increase reservation to 69%, which was given Constitutional protection by the 85th Amendment. 
  6.   AIR 1993 SC 477.
  7.   AIR 1999 SC 3471.
  8.   AIR 2007 SC 71.
  9.   AIR 1996 SC 448.
  10.   Ajit Singh Janjua v. State of Punjab, AIR 1996 SC 1189.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details